Galloping Globalism
                          by Rev. N.W. Hutchings

     Globalism,  by definition,  is the envisioned  utopian  state  of 
mankind   whereby   all  national  and  international  barriers,   now 
separating the human race into various nations,  are eliminated.  When 
these  barriers  are eventually liquidated,  all peoples on earth will 
subscribe to one religion,  one system of  economics,  and  will  give 
allegiance  to  one  world  government.   As  long  as  present  world 
economic,   religious,   and  governmental   barriers   remain,   this 
globalistic estate cannot be achieved.  
     According  to the Prophetic Word of God,  Satan,  during the last 
seven years of this present age,  will make a supreme attempt to bring 
about  a  global  world  so  he can forever add this planet to his own 
kingdom (government) and prevent the return of Jesus  Christ:  And  it 
was given unto him to make war with the saints,  and to overcome them: 
and power was given him over all kindreds,  and tongues,  and nations. 
And  all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him,  whose names are 
not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the  foundation 
of  the  world...  And he had power to give life unto the image of the 
beast,  that the image of the beast should both speak,  and cause that 
as  many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. 
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bon, 
to recieve a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that 
no man might buy or sell,  save he that had the mark,  or the name  of 
the beast, or the number of his name (Rev. 13:7,8 15-17).  
     In  the Bible it is prophesied that in the last days one man will 
be given governmental power over  all  nations,  regardless  of  race, 
religion,  or language.  This man will also enforce a common system of 
economics;  no individual will work,  buy,  or sell  except  by  state 
permission.  There will also be one religion - everyone will worship a 
new god, the Antichrist, or be killed.  
     Regardless of the utopian promises of the internationalists, one-
worlders  and  globalists,  there  is  no  way  to  tear down existing 
national,  economic and religious barriers except through a process of 
universal  execution.  For  example,  there  is  no  way  to  attain a 
marriage between communism and capitalism;  no way leaders of the free 
world and the communist world will agree on a common govenment; no way 
Moslems,  Jews,  Buddhists  and  Christians  will  meet  in communion, 
brotherhood and assemble except under penalty of death.  In  order  to 
attain  a globalist society,  Satan will offer a new age,  a new world 
not tied to political systems, economics,  or gods of religions rooted 
in ages past.  Even so,  how many still will refuse, under sentence of 
death,  to deny  their  country  or  their  god?  The  Prophetic  Word 
indicates hundreds of millions, and possibly billions, will die in war 
or  by  state  execution  for  the  witness of Jesus...  (beheading in 
Rev.20:4).  
     In considering the evolution of the global concept  for  mankind, 
we  begin with God's blessing upon Noah and the patriarch's seed after 
the Flood.  God then divided the human race into nations, according to 
the seventy grandsons of  Noah.  According  to  Genesis  9,  Acts  17, 
Romans 13, 1 Timothy 2, and many other Scriptures, God established the 
nations according to race,  colorc language and then set the bounds of 
these nations.  These different peoples, according to God's will, were 
to   appoint   rulers   to   establish   governments.    The   primary 
responsibility  of  government is to maintain social order through the 
administration  of  justice;   to  wit,  protection  the  innocent  by 
diligently  prosecuting  the guilty - the ultimate penalty being death 
for murder.  The secondary responsibility of government  is  to  grant 
every citizen freedom of religious expression, whereby each individual 
is  given  the opportunity to know the truth that Jesus Christ is both 
Lord and Saviour of all who believe in Him.  The purpose for  dividing 
the  world  into nations was to prevent the spiritual contamination of 
all mankind as had occurred before the Flood.  
     From about 2450 B.C.  until 1945 A.D.  (a period of approximately 
4400  years)  the  world,  for  the  most  part,  operated  within the 
political framework outlined in God's ordinance for human  government.  
It  is  true  some  nations rose and fell;  some became aggressors and 
consumed other nations.  But in the course of time, these empires fell 
and national boundaries were restored.  However,  at the beginning  of 
the  20th  century.  a  prophecy of Daniel had a pivotal effect on the 
future course of history:  But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words,  and 
seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, 
and  knowledge shall be increased (Daniel 12:4).  Steamships,  trains, 
telegraph, radio, television, etc... the world suddenly became smaller 
and smaller.  Through increased knowledge,  along with development  of 
rapid communications and faster methods of travel, nations thoughts of 
miles  apart  suddenly  became  next  door  neighbors!  An undesirable 
consequence of the fulfillment of Daniel's prophecy is wars  increased 
in size and intensity.  
     After   World   War   I,   many  of  the  world's  most  profound 
intellectuals and politicians concluded  nations  must  resolve  their 
problems  and  differences  without war or mankind eventually would be 
destroyed.  
     Thus,  the  League  of  Nations,   and  international  forum  for 
representation  from  all  nations,  was formed to meet and peacefully 
settle national conflicts without ware.  The  United  States  did  not 
join  the  League  of Nations,  because at that people did not want to 
relinquish any degree  of  national  sovereignty.  Most  nations  that 
became  members only gave "lip service" to the organization,  much for 
the same reason.  
     Nevertheless,  the  seeds  for  the  international  community  of 
nations   was   planted.   These   seed  were  carefully  nurtured  by 
individuals like John Dewey in the American educational system.  
     Just two decades after World  War  I,  came  World  War  II.  The 
second  world war exceeded the first world war many-fold in both scope 
and casualties.  Even though the framework  for  a  new  international 
forum of nations had been laid.  World War II ended with the explosion 
of  two  atomic bombs over Japan.  This dramatic and awesome ending to 
the most destructive war waged on planet  earth  served  as  proof  to 
internationalism  advocates  that  international  institutions must be 
established,  or man surely would destroy himself and all other living 
things.  
     Presto,  the League of Nations was reborn under a new  name  -The 
United  Nations.  Birthed  with the United Nations was a host of other 
international social,  political,  and economic entities which were to 
help   bring   UN   membership   into   a  trusting,   interdependent, 
international relationship.  Just a few of  these  organizations  are: 
International   City  Managers'  Association;   International  Control 
Commission;  International Court of  Justice;  International  Monetary 
Fund;   International   Peace  Corps;   and  the  International  Trade 
Organization.  
     Since 1945 there have been a series of major  wars  (Korean  War, 
South  Vietnam  War and other serious political and economic struggles 
with the Communist world) in which the United States  has  played  the 
"international   good-neighbor"   role   to  the  hilt.   Through  the 
International Monetary Fund,  the U.S.  gave gold  to  other  nations; 
through the Marshall Plan,  it built up its most deadly foes,  Germany 
and Japan, into major, industrial comepetitors;  and through retention 
of its United Nations membership, it bor the bore burden of cost while 
being  constantly  attacked  by  at  least  three-fourths  of  the  UN 
membership.  
     In our schools we are allowing the disciples of  internationalism 
to  indoctrinate  our  childred with their gospel.  Dr.  C.M.  Pierce, 
Harvad University,  stated at a  convention  of  teachers  in  Denver, 
Colorado  in  1973:  Every  child in American who enters school at age 
five is mentally ill,  because he  comes  to  school  with  allegiance 
toward our elected officials,  toward our founding fathers, toward our 
institutions,  toward the preservation of this form  of  government...  
patriotism,  nationalism,  sovereighty...   All  of  that  proves  the 
children are sick,  because the truly well individual is one  who  has 
rejected  all  of  those  things  and  is  what  I would call the true 
international  child  of  the  future.   Professor  Pierce  and  other 
internationalism  advocates  did  not understand that internationalism 
would be short lived.  While the course of mankind,  in  the  economic 
and  political sense,  has been directed mainly through the channel of 
internationalism since 1945, today it is the throes of death.  
     Internationalism has given way to  Globalism.  Those  who  equate 
internationalists  with  globalists  make  a  serious error.  Even the 
League of Nations - now the United Nations,  and related agencies like 
the  International Monetary Fund,  recognize the existence of nations.  
Globalism   acknowledges   no   boundaries,    either   national    or 
international.  While  modern  Paul  Reveres  have been running up and 
down the street shouting,  "The Internationalists  are  coming!",  the 
globalist wolf has entered our kitchen through the back door and eaten 
our  lunch.  For  the first time in history,  why do foreign investors 
and industrialists  own  more  property  in  the  United  States  then 
Americans  own in other countries?  Why can't President Reagan reverse 
the balance-of-trade deficit that  has  now  exceeded  $150-billion  a 
year?  Why  can't  the American auto and steel industries be protected 
against lower-price foreign  imports?  The  answer  to  all  of  these 
questions  is  galloping globalism.  To illustrate,  we quote from the 
July 8, 1985 edition of Industry Week, from an article titled "The Now 
Global Game,  One World-One Market":  The world economic order created 
and sustained by the Industrial Revolution, and brought to its keenest 
cutting edge following World War II, is fading.  Old power structures, 
alliances,  and  consumer  values  - all the old gods that underpinned 
international politics and global competition -  are  being  reshaped.  
And   the   forces   driving   these   changes  -  including  advanced 
communications system - have set in motion some far-reaching economic, 
political,  and psychological tremors.  In the accompanying  paranoia, 
nations  have  resorted  to  fingerpointing,   grumbling,  and  veiled 
threats.  And tensions are certain to grow as the  new  'global  game' 
unfolds.  Thomas Campbell,  a Stanford University law professor,  sees 
the world steadily drifting toward a paralysis of trade.  'It could be 
as  severe  as the which fueled the Great Depression,' he warns.  'The 
world is on the  verge  of  reverting  into  hostile  camps.  All  the 
efforts  that nations have made since World War II in opening up trade 
are now in peril. 'Charlies L.  Brown, chairman of AT&T Co., also sees 
the world at a crossroads.  
     'We   can   follow  an  expansive  approach  and  seek  increased 
international cooperation,' he says.  'Or we can opt for a restricting 
approach  and  withdraw behind the walls of protectionism and national 
pride.' 
      At  stake  in  all  of  this  is  the  future  of  the  'global' 
corporation,  which  scholars  view as distinct from the multinational 
corporation.  
      The global corporation, they point out,  tends to view the world 
as  a  homogenous  market rather than a collection of separate markets 
with  unique  requirements.   Professor  Theodore  Levitt  at  Harvard 
Business  School,  one  of  the  most respected marketing minds in the 
country,  has long been a champion of the global corporation  and  the 
'globalization'  or  markets.  'What  we  are  dealing  with here,' he 
declares, 'is a implacable force; a tide and not a wave.' 
      While we weep not at  the  grave-site  of  internationalism,  at 
least  the  internationalists professed to have a concern for the poor 
and underprivileged in all nations.  While tears of the  international 
one-worlders  for  suffering  humanity  are  mostly  of  the crocodile 
variety, the globalists do not even pretend to have a conscience.  Who 
cares if a million auto workers lose their jobs in the  United  States 
because  of lower priced imports?  Their loss will balance out against 
a gain in the Orient or Europe.  Here is how the global game works  as 
we  quote  again from the article in Industry Week:  "The only playing 
card that some countries have is their pool  of  low-cost  labor,  but 
with factory automation, this is becoming less of a bargaining chip.  
      Moreover, the spread of technology has created a worldwide labor 
pool  -  one in which workers in one country actively compete for jobs 
with workers elsewhere.  A case in point: workers in Barbados now earn 
$2.50 an hour keypunching data into American Airlines computers.  
      Previously, the task was done by 200 U.S.  workers in Tulsa, who 
earned $6.50 an hour." 
     Because  of  expanding  global  technology,  communications,  and 
investment interests,  worker in one country can,  by the flick  of  a 
switch, take over jobs being performed by workers in another country.  
     American  Airlines  saved  $6,400  a  day  by  having  workers in 
Barbados do the same job that workers in Tulsa were  doing.  This  was 
made   possible  through  a  world-wide,   computerized  communication 
network.  
     But  what  about the workers in Tulsa?  What will happen to them?  
A few may find  employment  elsewhere,  but  most  will  experience  a 
difficult period of financial adjustment.  This difficult situation in 
Tulsa is being multiplied many times over in other cities, and it will 
continue  to worsen unless American workers are willing to adjust to a 
global work scale.  The article in Industry Week points out within the 
next 15 years an additional 600 million,  trained workers  will  enter 
the  global  work  force.  Because  it will be suicidal for workers to 
strike,  unions will become a thing of the past.  Necessity will bring 
about  an  equalization  of the wage scale on a global basis under the 
global economic system,  the only recourse for industry and workers in 
the  United  States  is  a  tariff  on  imports  and foreign services.  
However,  for reasons  we  later  explain,  protectionism  will  bring 
foreign banking reprisals that could possible result in total economic 
collapse.  
     It  also stands to reason,  and the globalism article in Industry 
Week contends,  global economics is bringing with it serious political 
and  psychological  changes.   The  word,   psychological,   is  often 
substituted for religious.  While  global  advocates  do  not  overtly 
declare  man  lives  by  bread alone,  they do contend the food on the 
family table determines a man's political  views.  And,  according  to 
Revelation 13, men will one day be forced to worship the Antichrist as 
god in order to get it!  
     There  already is developing an alarming global control of labor, 
industry, commerce, banking and communications.  Today, we see a giant 
step taken to that point when every person will be under  the  control 
of a single authority,  and all will work, buy, and sell using numbers 
for names and code  marks  for  identification  and  exchange  values.  
According to the Bible,  the bringing on of such a global society will 
result in more deaths than claimed in all past wars  in  history.  But 
for Christians this is an even greater reason to discern the 'signs of 
the times' and be prepared for our Lord's return.  
            
Continued in GLOBAL2.TXT
Downloaded from the Goodnews BBS MI
313-459-8375
the Great Depression,' he warns.  'The 
world is on the  verge
../