WHEN DID THE FOSSILS DIE?
by John D. Morris, Ph.D.

Beginning in the early 1800s, Christian leaders began to be perplexed 
by the fossils. Their problem stemmed from the facts that: 1) fossils 
appear to be the remains of once-living plants and animals; 2) some 
scientists, such as James Hutton and Charles Lyell, claimed to have 
"proven" that the fossils were laid down by slow and gradual processes 
taking place over long periods of time; 3) a straightforward reading 
of the Bible indicates that the creation was only thousands of years 
ago, and that death was not a part of God's original plan, but was 
introduced due to Adam and Eve's sin.

Most scientists and theologians, up until this time, attributed the 
fossils to the destruction of the earth by the Flood of Noah's day. 
But once the concept of a very old earth began to gain support, 
something had to be done with the fossils. Theologians led the way to 
general acceptance of this idea by proposing a number of 
possibilities, each of which claimed to salvage the Bible in the face 
of what they feared was contrary evidence.

Damaging compromising concepts included the idea that Noah's Flood was 
only the last in a long series of world-altering catastrophes, with 
most of the fossils dating from long-ago floods. Others began to 
propose that the Flood of Noah was "tranquil," that it covered the 
mountains without leaving any fossil or geologic trace, or held to a 
local flood which covered only the Mesopotamian River Valley, with the 
fossils predating that flood.

C.l. Scofield popularized a view called the Gap Theory, which placed 
vast eons of time between Verses 1 and 2 of Genesis 1, for, as he 
wrote in his reference Bible, "Relegate fossils to the primitive 
creation, and no conflict of science with the Genesis cosmogony 
remains" (Page 4). More popular compromises today are the Day-Age 
Theory, that the days of Genesis were long periods of time during 
which the fossils were laid down; and Theistic Evolution, which 
disregards Genesis altogether. The up-and-coming compromise in 
evangelical seminaries today is the Framework Hypothesis which holds 
that Genesis contains only spiritual truth, but not scientific or 
historical truth. Each of these purports to do away with the problem 
of fossils, but in reality, they only end up distorting Scripture.

What would lead Bible-believing Christians to accept speculations 
about the past by men who live in the present, who don't know 
everything, who weren't there in the past to see fossils laid down, 
and who deny the Word of God to start with? Why would Christians seek 
to twist the Bible to make it fit such speculations?

The Bible is the record of One who does know everything about the past 
and the present. In it, the Author plainly tells us that death entered 
the world as a result of man's sinful actions. "The wages of sin is 
death" (Romans 6:23). (See also Genesis 2:17, 3:19; Romans 5:12, 8:22; 
etc.)

The Bible also tells us of the great worldwide Flood following the 
entrance of death, which would necessarily have laid down great 
deposits of water-borne sediments full of the dead remains of living 
things. The sediments have now turned into sedimentary rock, and the 
dead things have turned into fossils.

We can't prove, from a strictly scientific perspective, the Flood of 
Noah, but the nature of the fossil record is just what we would expect 
to see from the record of the Bible. We would do well to trust the 
testimony of the One who was there to see the fossils laid down, 
rather than the speculations of those who weren't!

../